Plagiarism Policy

The International Journal of Research (IJR) emphasizes the importance of originality in academic publishing and has established a rigorous policy to combat plagiarism. While specific details about IJR’s plagiarism checking policy were not provided in your initial description, a typical policy for a reputable international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal like IJR can be outlined as follows:

Plagiarism Checking Policy of IJR

1. Definition of Plagiarism: IJR defines plagiarism as the act of using another person’s words, ideas, results, or images without appropriate attribution, making them appear as if they are the author’s own. This includes all forms of textual, conceptual, and data plagiarism, and applies to published and unpublished works.

2. Pre-Submission Checks:

  • Authors’ Responsibilities: Authors are required to ensure that their manuscripts are completely original works. They must properly cite or quote all sources and ideas that are not their own and provide full acknowledgments where necessary.
  • Declaration of Originality: Often, authors must submit a declaration stating that the work submitted is original and has not been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), except as an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis.

3. Plagiarism Detection Software:

  • Software Utilization: IJR uses plagiarism detection software to screen all submissions before they undergo peer review. This software checks the content of the manuscript against a database of published and unpublished works to identify possible instances of plagiarism.
  • Threshold for Acceptance: The acceptable level of similarity and specific thresholds (e.g., percentage of plagiarized content) can vary, but typically, any high similarity index would warrant further investigation.

4. Handling of Plagiarism:

  • Initial Detection: If potential plagiarism is detected by the software, the manuscript will be reviewed by the editorial team. The context and extent of the plagiarized content are considered to determine whether it is incidental or constitutes a major violation of ethical standards.
  • Communication with Authors: In cases of apparent plagiarism, the authors are contacted with evidence of the possible misconduct and asked to provide an explanation or clarification.
  • Actions: Depending on the severity of the plagiarism, actions may include rejection of the manuscript, requests for revision and proper attribution, or in severe cases, reporting the incident to the authors’ institutions or barring the authors from submitting to the journal in the future.

5. Post-Publication Actions:

  • Retraction of Articles: If plagiarism is discovered after publication, IJR may retract the published article. A retraction notice explaining the reason for the retraction and who was responsible for the plagiarism will be published to maintain the integrity of the academic record.

6. Prevention and Education:

  • Guidance and Resources: IJR provides authors with guidelines on proper citation practices and advice on how to avoid plagiarism. These resources are intended to educate authors, particularly those less familiar with academic publishing standards.

Conclusion

IJR’s plagiarism checking policy reflects its commitment to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and ethical conduct. By rigorously checking for plagiarism and taking decisive actions against violations, IJR ensures the originality and credibility of the research it publishes, thereby contributing to the trustworthiness and quality of the academic record.